The Enslavement of America
64I Am Not The Only One
A very good friend sent me a video link the other day and it has been festering in my conspiracle mind.
Have you ever heard of Agenda 21?
I hadn't, but I have had many of the same thoughts on what is happening in America. It is called Sustainable Development and is the non-caring of family.
The government will control everything from your pharmacy to your grocery store and so on. Heck, you may as well call G.M.C. Government Motors Center now.
I see it and I want you all to see it too.
Watch the following video and we will discuss this after:
One World Government
I watch every single day, mankind is just giving their rights away.
There was a day that a human being was presumed innocent until proven guilty. It is not that way anymore.
I do believe the RFID chip will be a downfall. The chip has built momentum. I have been studying how they will use this chip to follow all of mankinds movements. Some people may say, " they are not putting one of those in me. " How do you know you don't already have one? Do you know that dentist, doctor, surgeon or some others that well?
The goal is to have the knowledge of what every human is doing at any time. Those that won't be controlled, such as myself, will be thrown in camps that are prisons. Some believe that there will even be extermination.
There has always been a drive by the evil in some men to have total power of this little speck in the great expanse of God's universe.
What To Do
We must first and foremost be in prayer. Who, but God can confuse and fluster these men and women who are led by an ultimate evil.
You will know those who are with you by their words and deeds.
A big key is to not believe every thing that is thrown out. Propaganda has always been a tool of the evil. Do you know for sure that Korea has been testing nukes? Are you right there?
It's just a thought; I don't doubt they have, but wouldn't it be possible for our government to do that?
The day is getting near. Technology can be used for both good and bad. What are you doing with it?
I am looking for a hot discussion on this topic. All comments will be approved, please don't be vulgar.
When your job is gone, will you be a slave to the government? I believe that it was Ben Franklin who said that every so many years the American people would have to take their government back. I believe it is time to do that. Let's hear your thoughts.
CommentsLoading...
I agree with Tom. This is slipping quickly!
One World Government
Froggy says, "I have been studying how they will use this chip to follow all of mankinds movements"
I have no doubt that, in the future, electronic identification will be required to purchase food, buy property, and to vote. Additionally, it will be required to seek medical care, use public transportation, and enter public buildings. It will not be required, but it will be difficult to live without it. Proponents will advocate the necessity for it by arguing for security and anti-terrorism, as always.Get this; these chips use a hexadecimal base number for digital processing. Hexadecimal is base 6. The chips will be planted where a satellite can pick up your id so they need to be somewhere high, like on your head, scalp, or forehead. You WILL be branded 666.
Well, this certainly cheered me up! Just kidding. I have no doubt there are powers and principalities who are planning this right now. But as Yogi Berra said, "It ain't over 'til it's over."
Good information to think about. Thanks.
(shrugs noncomittally)"So what if our current rate of population growth is unsustainable?
I want what I want, it is my right, given to me by divine origin, and to heck with the rest of the planet!"
Unknown
Seriously though.... What should we do? If our population keeps growing at the rate that it is, we will consume this planet eventually. Maybe not in 50 years, maybe not in 2000, but eventually.. Right? No one can currently dispute that, eh?
Do we just hang our hats on "this life is just a dream, we will be on to another soon" and leave it at that? I am trying not to be sarcastic, but I think there is miles of middle ground between that and a decent solution to our planets woes, between the intent of the folks who started Article 21 and the way that first video portays it. It smacks of propaganda, gives little fact, and mainly just tries to scare me into thinking I am going to lose "every thing that I hold dear". I am certainly not saying that I know enough about article 21 to make a judgement on how evil the people were who created it, but that video certainly didn't give me much more than I already had.. Hmm.. Greg, where's the rest of the story? I can't seem to find it with google... all I find is peoples opinions of it, articles about it, etc...
What it seems to come down to is that regardless of what ones reality/belief structure/soul/logic dictates, it is a FACT that we all (you and I, the birds and snakes, the grass and trees, etc) have to be able to sustain this planet indefinitely, and live together in some sort of cooperative method/harmony. We (humans) are gluttons. We (humans) aren't currently doing our part. All other creatures seems to be existing very well, actually serving the planet. We, I would assume, should be the Stewards then, yes? We are the only creatures who seem to have the choice to outgrow our resources, or harmonize with the rest of nature.
Again, not trying to just be grouchy (though I am venting a little since froggy requested a heated discussion) but I seriously want to know:
This hub does spell out a problem. Can we present a plausible, logical solution? (preferably one that doesn't involve a hexadecimal MIDIchip phobia-type rationale?)
I look forward to the rousing debate.. (remember, I am an undecided seeker, asking questions and having a chat... don't take my comment too sardonically)
Great comment Cricket--blow some steam off, but you may have just jumped into a beehive.
I essentially pick up that because of a population explosion that our rights should be dismantled. Am I correct?
I don't have any straight-up answer except I think mankind needs to stand upon the morals and freedoms that our Grandparents stood on.
There is no simple answer; I am looking forward to the discussion/debates on this issue.
Anytime I say anything that isn't extremely pleasant, I run the risk of stirring up a beehive. I am strangely comfortable with it. LOL
You asked:
"I essentially pick up that because of a population explosion that our rights should be dismantled. Am I correct?"
Yes and no.. Nothing is as cut and dry as that, I am sure you would agree.. But the plain fact is that if something isn't done about the population boom on this planet very soon (whether that be 100 years or 5,000) there will be one person for every square inch of land on the planet. How's that gonna work? Allow me to answer that.. It won't.
To me this means that, at some point in the future, SOMEONE will be told that "you are not allowed to have any more children" (as an example)...
It appears to me as though this statement would be unacceptable if someone said it to you or your children, yes? Then it behooves you (or anyone else who may be unwilling to make those types compromises for the perpetuation of the planet and it's inhabitants) to bring forth a plausible solution that will work for all parties involved.
I am ready to invest my time in that endeavor, but I don't see a light at the end of that tunnel either, at least not just yet. (unless of course, you count going to heaven when I die and not worrying about this silly speck we call a planet, which is in my Diety's capable hands) And I especially don't see a light at the end of the tunnel if we can't keep the solutions in the realm of our current, tangible reality. (I.E. we cannot consider superstitions or the supernatural or anything else that isn't etheral, as it will only be debated, rather than decided upon, and cannot be proven either way)
In conclusion, and to finish my long answer to your short question.. I am not suggesting a complete dismantling of our rights, but rather a choice; a compromise for the good of all, or no compromise to the detriment of all.. That is sorta how I see it, and I think that is how the original authors of Article 21 saw it. From my brief research so far it seems evident to me that the originators of the Article weren't trying to make a set in stone blueprint for how our future should be built, but rather were trying to point to some problems and present plausible solutions. Some good, some bad, some scary, some downright stupid. All in all I think it was a decent effort that is being unfairly demonized. But I may be wrong, as I stated before I am having trouble finding Article 21 itself, and have mainly just come across fear mongering opinions about the One World Order and such. To which I sincerely ask this:
Aren't you (and your christian bretheren, the Muslims, and others) also advocating one world order? The Bible says that "every knee shall bow and every tongue confess".. The Quaran has a similar passage. So at some point in this worlds future every human shall be of accord with each other. Isn't that the same thing as One World Order?
You said:
"I think mankind needs to stand upon the morals and freedoms that our Grandparents stood on."
I don't know that I agree. Some of us have grandparents that stood on some pretty goofy and far-fetched morals, didn't they? Ideals like "Women are inferior to men", "Colored people are inferior to anglo-saxons", or "If we throw her in the river tied to a rock and she floats, she's a witch. If we throw her in tied to a rock and she sinks, she's not a witch and will be sorely missed." I am not so sure that I want to stand behind that type of moral certainty...
It's a deep rabbit hole, I will agree.. FWIW that's what I like about debating the imponderables with you, Greg (now that you have gotten past the "I am gonna slap that guy upside the head!" phase.. LOL)... You tend to at least entertain my wiley ideas.
Any possibility of finding me a link to the actual Article 21? I am interested in reading all of it, if for no other reason than to debate it further.
this is certainly something interesting to think about. I think there are two different topics here. on the conspiracy part, well nothing would surprise me, but I don't think powerful men think of anything other than making money so I personally don't think it's a conspiracy at this time. my view is subject to change with information acquired, however.
on the other topic, I had a friend who once noted that in some not too distant future it is possible that the majority of labor might be done by machines or robots. certainly history shows the trend of inreased productivity per person which simultaneously dislodges employment for many. if that trend continues and maybe only 10%, say, of the U.S. is required to keep the country going, what happens to the other 'valueless' 90%? It's a good question.
Do you really think Washington DC contains a Government that is: “FOR and BY The People”? Do you think “The Powers That Control” have the best interest of the citizens of the states at heart, or just their own?
Want some astounding information that will settle the questions we are all asking concerning the above?
This web site has information providing the research to get the answers and a solution for you as an individual.
Tom Cornett Level 3 Commenter 2 years ago
A hit on the nail head hub. The future is compliance to what they will state as "The Greater Cause." Notice how apartment complexes are being built close to low wage industry. It has been going on for some time now. Ownership of a vehicle will be impossible for anyone but the wealthy few.
Where are the millions of people who lost their homes moving to? The old "Company Store" mentality is returning. "Let's pay them and let them think they are free!"
Great hub!